There is a question women of a certain age, in a certain kind of marriage, will recognise immediately.
Your husband is doing well. So why are you still working?
It is not always asked directly. Sometimes it arrives as an observation. Sometimes as a mild confusion. Sometimes as the pause before someone changes the subject, which is its own kind of answer. But it arrives. And what is interesting is not the question itself. It is how prepared we are for it. The response rarely comes as simply as the question was asked. It comes with context, with framing, with a version of the story that makes the choice easier to receive. Because I want to is not a sufficient answer. It doesn’t land as complete. It leaves something open that the other person was expecting to have closed.
Women’s ambition needs a story behind it.
The version that travels most easily is the one with a majboori. A financial crisis. A husband who is unwell. A family that needed someone to step up. These are celebrated, genuinely and warmly, because they make sense within a framework that already exists. The woman who works because she must is a recognisable character. The woman who works because she wants to, because her husband is doing perfectly fine and she is doing this entirely for herself, is a slightly more complicated proposition. Not unwelcome exactly. She just comes with a question attached.
And we learn to answer it before it is asked.
I travelled for work when my daughter was five. Long trips, once a year, three weeks at a stretch. Every time I went, people asked me who was looking after her at home. Colleagues I had only ever seen on fifteen inch screens, finally meeting in person, across cultures, across countries, across age groups. I assumed, for longer than I should have, that they were making polite conversation.
It took me an embarrassingly long time to notice the pattern.
Nobody asked my husband. Not when he travelled for three weeks. Not when he was away for any stretch of time. I know this because I asked him directly, and he thought about it genuinely, and confirmed that no, it had not come up. Not once, across years of travel.
The same trip. Different questions.
Because he didn’t need a story. His choice to travel for work arrived as self-evident. Mine arrived as something that required an explanation, and the explanation everyone was waiting for was about who had taken on what I had left behind. The assumption, built in and unspoken, was that my being away created a gap that needed to be accounted for. His being away was just work.
This is not a men versus women conversation, or at least I don’t want it to be. What I am more interested in is the story layer. Why women need one for the same choices men make without one. Why because I want to has never quite been sufficient on its own. Why the justification arrives before anyone has asked for it, offered preemptively, smoothly, out of a habit so old it no longer feels like habit.
I have done this. Most women I know have done this. You develop a version of your own story that is accurate but also, quietly, arranged. Not dishonest. Just shaped for easier passage.
It is not just careers.
A woman who is introverted, who doesn’t stay in close contact with extended family or old friends, is read as someone who doesn’t keep up relations. The simpler explanation, that polite civility is enough, that not every relationship needs to be carried into closeness, rarely gets used. Instead there are stories about being busy, about meaning to call, about how terrible she is at keeping in touch, said with a laugh that pre-empts the judgement. The apology arrives before anyone has complained.
And then there is self care, which deserves its own paragraph because the justifications we have developed for it are genuinely impressive in their creativity.
I need a facial because I have a party next week. I am getting my hair done because there is a wedding in the family. I bought this because it was on sale, not because I wanted it, although I also wanted it, but the sale is doing a lot of heavy lifting in this sentence. We narrate our small indulgences as though we are filing expense reports. Reasonable expenditures, here are the receipts, please approve. Nobody asked. The approval process exists entirely in our own heads, staffed by a committee we assembled ourselves, which has very strong opinions and meets without notice.
The language softens before it lands everywhere else too. I just thought. I happened to come across. It sort of worked out. Achievements arrive wrapped in modesty so they are easier to accept. A woman who says plainly, I did that, I built that, that was mine, is doing something that requires more nerve than it should. And success, when it arrives, is quickly furnished with supporting evidence of everything else being intact. She is also a good mother. She is grounded. She manages everything, said with a note of relief underneath the admiration. The success alone feels incomplete as a story. It needs the rest of the picture.
What is remarkable is not that these expectations exist. It is how efficiently we have all learned to work within them. How naturally we reach for the version that will move through the room without catching on anything.
But here is the part that is easiest to overlook, and also the part that is most uncomfortable to sit with.
The questions about who was caring for my daughter at home were not only asked by men. They were asked by women. Colleagues, friends, relatives, other mothers who had navigated the same choices and arrived at different answers. The comment about why she is still working when her husband is doing well, that is not a sentence spoken only by men either. The raised eyebrow at the woman who doesn’t stay in close contact, the quiet judgement about the mother who travels, the slight discomfort with unqualified success, these travel through women just as efficiently as anywhere else.
We are not just recipients of the story. We are active participants in its circulation.
We tell it to each other. We tell it to our daughters, sometimes in words, more often in the smaller instructions that don’t announce themselves as instructions. We tell it to ourselves, which is perhaps where it does the most durable work, because the story you have internalised doesn’t need anyone else to enforce it. You carry it with you and apply it faithfully, to your own choices, your own indulgences, your own ambitions, your own time.
This is what the title means, and it is a little uncomfortable to say directly.
The stories about women are told by women. Regulated by women. Passed on by women. Not because we are the problem, that would be too simple and also too convenient. But because we learned the script early, delivered it fluently, were rewarded for it, and then, without entirely meaning to, handed it to the next person in line.
I am not outside this either. I have told the easier version of my own choices more times than I can count, and often before anyone asked. I have said I just thought and it happened to work out and there is a party next week. I have heard myself explain a decision that required no explanation, to someone who hadn’t asked for one.
And sometimes, in the middle of the reasonable version, there is a small quiet moment where I know exactly what the simpler version would have been. And I keep going anyway. Which is, I suppose, its own kind of answer.
This post is a part of Blogchatter A2Z Challenge 2026 .
I’ve done A2ZChallenge in 2017, where I collected 26 quotes by people whose names started with the letter of the day. In 2015, the theme was professional life.
Discover more from Lifestyle of a Professional
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
